<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brent Kearney &#187; information technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brent.kearneys.ca/category/information-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brent.kearneys.ca</link>
	<description>Health, Fitness, Technology, and Other Interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:15:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Business Case for Google&#8217;s China Defiance</title>
		<link>http://brent.kearneys.ca/2010/01/14/a-business-case-for-googles-china-defiance/</link>
		<comments>http://brent.kearneys.ca/2010/01/14/a-business-case-for-googles-china-defiance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brent.kearneys.ca/?p=2043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology news has been abuzz for the past couple of days, following Google&#8217;s dramatic announcement that it will no longer comply with the Chinese government&#8217;s demands to censor their citizen&#8217;s web searches, and if necessary, will leave China altogether. In other words, Google is leaving China. The decision follows the discovery that Google&#8217;s e-mail servers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology news has been abuzz for the past couple of days, following <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html">Google&#8217;s dramatic announcement</a> that it will no longer comply with the Chinese government&#8217;s demands to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4645596.stm">censor their citizen&#8217;s web searches</a>, and if necessary, will leave China altogether.  In other words, <em>Google is leaving China</em>.  The decision follows the discovery that Google&#8217;s e-mail servers were subject to a sophisticated security break-in that appears to have been carried out by the Chinese government.  The primary target of the attack was the e-mail accounts of Chinese human rights activists.</p>
<p>The confrontational announcement was posted on Google&#8217;s Blog at the end of the day, Jan 12th.  By the morning, their stock had dipped 2%, but its already on the rebound.</p>
<p><img src="http://brent.kearneys.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/GOOG.png" alt="" title="GOOG" width="535" height="300" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2051" /></p>
<p><span id="more-2043"></span></p>
<p>There are 300 million Internet users in China, and three quarters of their population is not yet online.  A sizable market indeed.  However, as <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_04/b4164035494362.htm">Businessweek points out</a>, Google China was set to make only $600 million in 2010, a fraction of Google&#8217;s overall $26 billion yearly revenue.  The loss is not a big one, and they reap the benefits of increased &#8220;brand equity&#8221; as Internet users everywhere revel in Google&#8217;s famous corporate motto, <em>Don&#8217;t be Evil</em>.</p>
<p>How this so-called brand equity will translate into real dollars is impossible to predict.  Nevertheless, I&#8217;m sure that it was part of Google&#8217;s calculation.  Many observers in the IT industry are <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10422528-16.html">predicting</a> that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing">cloud computing</a> is positioning to become a de-facto standard for both personal and enterprise IT in the coming years.  Google is probably the biggest player in cloud computing.</p>
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b5/Cloud_computing.svg/605px-Cloud_computing.svg.png" alt="The Cloud" width="550" /></p>
<p>If I were an IT manager who is <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/011910-gartner-cio-top-priorities.html">considering moving services into the cloud</a> instead of upgrading in-house servers, <em>which I am</em> &mdash; even though I know that Google&#8217;s leaving China may be financially justifiable &mdash; the fact that they seem to take their security and their founding principles seriously enough to make such a bold move stands out.  It makes them seem more trustworthy.  <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8456950.stm">Some people</a> are even calling them <em>heroic</em>.  </p>
<p>Can any amount of marketing achieve that kind of respect for a company?</p>
<p>In the end, decisions to move enterprise IT services to the cloud will be made by <em>people</em>, and Google&#8217;s China move has earned them a lot of credibility.  Hearts &#038; minds, as they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brent.kearneys.ca/2010/01/14/a-business-case-for-googles-china-defiance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

